Rules versus home rule: Local government responses to negative revenue shocks

Stan Veuger, Daniel Shoag and Cody Tuttle

AEI Economics Working Papers from American Enterprise Institute

Abstract: Local governments rely heavily on sales tax revenue. We use national bankruptcies of big-box retail chains to study sudden plausibly exogenous revenue shortfalls. Treated localities respond by reducing spending on law enforcement and administrative services. We further study how cities with different degrees of autonomy vary in their response. Cities in home rule states react more swiftly by raising taxes or issuing bonds. A regression discontinuity analysis of cities in Illinois emphasizes that this effect of local autonomy is causal. Home rule cities do not abuse their discretion: their bond ratings are more likely to be strong.

Keywords: State taxes; revenue; Local government (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aei.org/publication/local-government-responses-negative-revenue (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: Rules Versus Home Rule—Local Government Responses to Negative Revenue Shocks (2019)
Working Paper: Rules versus Home Rule: Local Government Responses to Negative Revenue Shocks (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aei:rpaper:953635

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in AEI Economics Working Papers from American Enterprise Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dave Adams, CIO ().