Slippage in the Conservation Reserve Program or Spurious Correlation? A Comment
Michael Roberts and
Shawn Bucholtz
American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2005, vol. 87, issue 1, 244-250
Abstract:
The Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) pays farmers about $2 billion per year to retire cropland under ten- to fifteen-year contracts. Recent research by Wu found that slippage—an unintended stimulus of new plantings—offsets some of CRP's environmental benefits. Wu does not account for the endogeneity of CRP enrollments. Furthermore, the data used by Wu cannot be used to estimate slippage arising from a price feedback effect. We replicate Wu's findings, demonstrate the possible presence of spurious correlation, and construct new estimates with corrections for endogeneity and other econometric problems. We find no convincing evidence of slippage. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (37)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.0002-9092.2005.00715.x (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:87:y:2005:i:1:p:244-250
Access Statistics for this article
American Journal of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Madhu Khanna, Brian E. Roe, James Vercammen and JunJie Wu
More articles in American Journal of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().