EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Bidder Preferences among Auction Institutions

Radosveta Ivanova-Stenzel and Tim Salmon

Economic Inquiry, 2004, vol. 42, issue 2, 223-236

Abstract: This study examines bidder preferences between alternative auction institutions. We seek to characterize experimentally the degree to which bidders prefer an ascending auction to a sealed bid auction. We find very strong ceteris paribus preferences for the ascending institution with bidders choosing it overwhelmingly often when entry prices for the two auctions are the same. When the entry prices of the two auctions differ, many subjects can be shown to be willing to pay more to enter the ascending auction than is explainable by their risk attitudes when accounting for their expectations about the risk preferences of their opponents. (JEL C91, D44) Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

JEL-codes: C91 D44 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (34)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ei/cbh056 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Bidder Preferences Among Auction Institutions (2004) Downloads
Working Paper: Bidder preferences among auction institutions (2002) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:42:y:2004:i:2:p:223-236

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Inquiry is currently edited by Preston McAfee

More articles in Economic Inquiry from Western Economic Association International Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:42:y:2004:i:2:p:223-236