Are Small-Scale SVARs Useful for Business Cycle Analysis? Revisiting Nonfundamentalness

Fabio Canova and Mehdi Hamidi Sahneh

Journal of the European Economic Association, 2018, vol. 16, issue 4, 1069-1093

Abstract: Nonfundamentalness arises when current and past values of the observables do not contain enough information to recover structural vector autoregressive (SVAR) disturbances. Using Granger causality tests, the literature suggested that several small-scale SVAR models are nonfundamental and thus not necessarily useful for business cycle analysis. We show that causality tests are problematic when SVAR variables cross-sectionally aggregate the variables of the underlying economy or proxy for nonobservables. We provide an alternative testing procedure, illustrate its properties with Monte Carlo simulations, and re-examine a prototypical small-scale SVAR model.

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jeea/jvx032 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Are Small-Scale SVARs Useful for Business Cycle Analysis? Revisiting Non-Fundamentalness (2016)
Working Paper: Are small scale VARs useful for business cycle analysis? Revisiting Non-Fundamentalness (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:16:y:2018:i:4:p:1069-1093.

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the European Economic Association is currently edited by Romain Wacziarg

More articles in Journal of the European Economic Association from European Economic Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().