Are Small-Scale SVARs Useful for Business Cycle Analysis? Revisiting Non-Fundamentalness
Fabio Canova ()
No No 2/2016, Working Papers from Centre for Applied Macro- and Petroleum economics (CAMP), BI Norwegian Business School
Non-fundamentalness arises when observables do not contain enough information to recover the vector of structural shocks. Using Granger causality tests, the literature suggested that many small scale VAR models are non-fundamental and thus not useful for business cycle analysis. We show that causality tests are problematic when VAR variables are cross sectionally aggregated or proxy for non-observables. We provide an alternative testing procedure, illustrate its properties with a Monte Carlo exercise, and reexamine the properties of two prototypical VAR models.
Keywords: Aggregation; Non-Fundamentalness; Granger causality; Small scale VARs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm and nep-ets
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.bi.edu/contentassets/5f68a465bade4f23b ... king_camp_2-2016.pdf (application/pdf)
Working Paper: Are small scale VARs useful for business cycle analysis? Revisiting Non-Fundamentalness (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bny:wpaper:0042
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Centre for Applied Macro- and Petroleum economics (CAMP), BI Norwegian Business School Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Helene Olsen ().