Are Small-Scale SVARs Useful for Business Cycle Analysis? Revisiting Non-Fundamentalness

Fabio Canova and Mehdi Hamidi Sahneh ()

No No 2/2016, Working Papers from Centre for Applied Macro- and Petroleum economics (CAMP), BI Norwegian Business School

Abstract: Non-fundamentalness arises when observables do not contain enough information to recover the vector of structural shocks. Using Granger causality tests, the literature suggested that many small scale VAR models are non-fundamental and thus not useful for business cycle analysis. We show that causality tests are problematic when VAR variables are cross sectionally aggregated or proxy for non-observables. We provide an alternative testing procedure, illustrate its properties with a Monte Carlo exercise, and reexamine the properties of two prototypical VAR models.

Keywords: Aggregation; Non-Fundamentalness; Granger causality; Small scale VARs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 35 pages
Date: 2016-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm and nep-ets
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.bi.edu/contentassets/5f68a465bade4f23b ... king_camp_2-2016.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Are Small-Scale SVARs Useful for Business Cycle Analysis? Revisiting Nonfundamentalness (2018)
Working Paper: Are small scale VARs useful for business cycle analysis? Revisiting Non-Fundamentalness (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bny:wpaper:0042

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Centre for Applied Macro- and Petroleum economics (CAMP), BI Norwegian Business School Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Helene Olsen ().