An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods
Uri Gneezy and
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, vol. 112, issue 2, 631-645
Does the period over which individuals evaluate outcomes influence their investment in risky assets? Results from this study show that the more frequently returns are evaluated, the more risk averse investors will be. The results are in line with the behavioral hypothesis of "myopic loss aversion," which assumes that people are myopic in evaluating outcomes over time, and are more sensitive to losses than to gains. The results have relevance for the equity premium puzzle, and also for the marketing strategies of fund managers.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (398) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods (1997)
Working Paper: An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:112:y:1997:i:2:p:631-645.
Access Statistics for this article
The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Elhanan Helpman, Lawrence F. Katz and Andrei Schleifer
More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .