A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation

Ernst Fehr and Klaus Schmidt ()

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999, vol. 114, issue 3, 817-868

Abstract: There is strong evidence that people exploit their bargaining power in competitive markets but not in bilateral bargaining situations. There is also strong evidence that people exploit free-riding opportunities in voluntary cooperation games. Yet, when they are given the opportunity to punish free riders, stable cooperation is maintained, although punishment is costly for those who punish. This paper asks whether there is a simple common principle that can explain this puzzling evidence. We show that if some people care about equity the puzzles can be resolved. It turns out that the economic environment determines whether the fair types or the selfish types dominate equilibrium behavior.

Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5415)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1162/003355399556151 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation (1999)
Working Paper: A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation (1998)
Chapter: A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation
Working Paper: A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:114:y:1999:i:3:p:817-868.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer and Stefanie Stantcheva

More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from President and Fellows of Harvard College
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().