One, Two, Many—Insensitivity to Group Size in Games with Concentrated Benefits and Dispersed Costs

Heiner Schumacher, Iris Kesternich, Michael Kosfeld and Joachim Winter ()

The Review of Economic Studies, 2017, vol. 84, issue 3, 1346-1377

Abstract: We experimentally analyse distributional preferences when a decider chooses the provision of a good that benefits herself or a receiver, and creates costs for a group of payers. The treatment variation is the number of payers. We observe that subjects provide the good even if there are many payers so that the costs of provision exceed the benefits by far. This result holds regardless of whether the provision increases the decider’s payoff or not. Intriguingly, it is not only selfish or maximin types who provide the good. Rather, we show that a substantial fraction of subjects are “insensitive to group size”: they reveal to care about the payoff of all parties, but attach the same weight to small and large groups so that they ignore large provision costs that are dispersed among many payers. Our results have important consequences for the approval of policies with concentrated benefits and large, dispersed cost, as well as the analysis of ethical behaviour, medical decision-making, and charity donations.

Keywords: Social preferences; Distribution games; Concentrated benefits and dispersed costs; Insensitivity to group size (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D63 H00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/restud/rdw043 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: One, Two, Many-Insensitivity to Group Size in Games with Concentrated Benefits and Dispersed Costs (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:84:y:2017:i:3:p:1346-1377.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman

More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().