The Law of Demand versus Diminishing Marginal Utility
Bruce R. Beattie and
Jeffrey LaFrance ()
Review of Agricultural Economics, 2006, vol. 28, issue 2, 263-271
Diminishing marginal utility (DMU) is neither necessary nor sufficient for downward-sloping demand. Yet, upper-division undergraduate and beginning graduate students often presume otherwise. This paper provides two simple counter-examples that can be used to help students understand that the Law of Demand does not depend on DMU. The examples are accompanied with the geometry and basic mathematics of the utility functions and the implied ordinary/Marshallian demands. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Journal Article: The Law of Demand versus Diminishing Marginal Utility (2006)
Working Paper: The Law of Demand Versus Diminishing Marginal Utility (2006)
Working Paper: The law of demand versus diminishing marginal utility (2006)
Working Paper: The Law of Demand Versus Diminishing Marginal Utility (2005)
Working Paper: The law of demand versus diminishing marginal utility (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:revage:v:28:y:2006:i:2:p:263-271
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Review of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().