The Law of Demand Versus Diminishing Marginal Utility

Bruce R. Beattie and Jeffrey LaFrance ()

No 25013, CUDARE Working Papers from University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics

Abstract: Diminishing marginal utility is neither necessary nor sufficient for downward sloping demand. Yet upper-division undergraduate and beginning graduate students often presume otherwise. This paper provides two simple counter examples that can be used to help students understand that the Law of Demand does not depend on diminishing marginal utility. The examples are accompanied with the geometry and basic mathematics of the utility functions and the implied ordinary/Marshallian demands.

Keywords: Demand; and; Price; Analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 20
Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/25013/files/CUDARE%20959R%20LaFrance.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The Law of Demand versus Diminishing Marginal Utility (2006)
Journal Article: The Law of Demand versus Diminishing Marginal Utility (2006)
Working Paper: The Law of Demand Versus Diminishing Marginal Utility (2006)
Working Paper: The law of demand versus diminishing marginal utility (2006)
Working Paper: The law of demand versus diminishing marginal utility (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:ucbecw:25013

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.25013

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CUDARE Working Papers from University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().