Limited and Varying Consumer Attention: Evidence from Shocks to the Salience of Bank Overdraft Fees
Victor Stango and
Jonathan Zinman ()
Review of Financial Studies, 2014, vol. 27, issue 4, 990-1030
We explore dynamics of limited attention in the $35 billion market for checking overdrafts, using survey content as shocks to the salience of overdraft fees. Conditional on selection into surveys, individuals who face overdraft-related questions are less likely to incur a fee in the survey month. Taking multiple overdraft surveys builds a "stock" of attention that reduces overdrafts for up to two years. The effects are significant among consumers with lower education and financial literacy. Individuals avoid overdrafts by making fewer low-balance debit transactions and cancelling automatic recurring withdrawals. The results raise new questions about consumer financial protection policy.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (31) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Limited and varying consumer attention: evidence from shocks to the salience of bank overdraft fees (2011)
Working Paper: Limited and Varying Consumer Attention: Evidence from Shocks to the Salience of Bank Overdraft Fees (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:27:y:2014:i:4:p:990-1030.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Financial Studies is currently edited by Maureen O'Hara
More articles in Review of Financial Studies from Society for Financial Studies Oxford University Press, Journals Department, 2001 Evans Road, Cary, NC 27513 USA.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().