Research Evaluation

1991 - 2025

Current editor(s): Julia Melkers, Emanuela Reale and Thed van Leeuwen

From Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

Access Statistics for this journal.
Is something missing from the series or not right? See the RePEc data check for the archive and series.

2012, volume 21, articles 5

Introducing the issue theme: Rising to the challenges of R&D impact assessment pp. 329-331

Juan D. Rogers

Understanding long-term impacts of R&D funding: The EU framework programme pp. 332-343

Erik Arnold

Research on derivative effects created by Japanese national R&D projects pp. 344-353

Sayaka Shishido, Masaru Yamashita, Junichi Yoshida and Mitsuru Takeshita

Evaluating health research impact: Development and implementation of the Alberta Innovates -- Health Solutions impact framework pp. 354-367

Kathryn E. R. Graham, Heidi L. Chorzempa, Pamela A. Valentine and Jacques Magnan

Program-level assessment of research centers: Contribution of Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers to US Nanotechnology National Initiative goals pp. 368-380

Juan D. Rogers, Jan Youtie and Luciano Kay

Assessing the effects of a collaborative research funding scheme: An approach combining meta-evaluation and evaluation synthesis pp. 381-391

Barbara Good

Social network analysis comparing researcher collaborations in two cardiovascular cohort studies pp. 392-405

Matthew Eblen, Richard R. Fabsitz, Jean L. Olson, Katrina Pearson, Lindsay R. Pool, Mona Puggal, Charles Wu and Robin M. Wagner

2012, volume 21, articles 4

Evaluating the functioning and impacts of funding schemes. New methodological developments of indicators pp. 243-244

Benedetto Lepori, Emanuela Reale and Maria Nedeva

The social construction of indicators for evaluation: Internationalization of Funding Agencies pp. 245-256

Emanuela Reale, Annamaria Inzelt, Benedetto Lepori and Peter van den Besselaar

Characterizing researchers to study research funding agency impacts: The case of the European Research Council's Starting Grants pp. 257-269

Duncan Thomas and Maria Nedeva

Funding programmes for young scientists--Do the 'best' apply? pp. 270-279

Jörg Neufeld and Stefan Hornbostel

The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science--a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005--9) pp. 280-290

Truyken L. B. Ossenblok, Tim C. E. Engels and Gunnar Sivertsen

Relational arenas in a regional Higher Education system: Insights from an empirical analysis pp. 291-305

M. Seeber, B. Lepori, Tommaso Agasisti, R. Tijssen, C. Montanari and G. Catalano

The use of behavioural additionality evaluation in innovation policy making pp. 306-318

Abdullah Gök and Jakob Edler

Assessment of the impact of a clinical and health services research call in Catalonia pp. 319-328

Paula Adam, Maite Solans-Domènech, Joan M. V. Pons, Marta Aymerich, Silvina Berra, Imma Guillamon, Emilia Sánchez and Gaietà Permanyer-Miralda

2012, volume 21, articles 3

The practice of evaluation in innovation policy in Europe pp. 167-182

Jakob Edler, Martin Berger, Michael Dinges and Abdullah Gök

An Integrated Impact Indicator: A new definition of 'Impact' with policy relevance pp. 183-188

Caroline Wagner and Loet Leydesdorff

Funding decisions, peer review, and scientific excellence in physical sciences, chemistry, and geosciences pp. 189-198

Thed N. van Leeuwen and Henk F. Moed

Research assessment and monetary rewards: the overemphasized impact factor in China pp. 199-203

Ju-fang Shao and Hui-yun Shen

Co-authored research publications and strategic analysis of public--private collaboration pp. 204-215

Robert J. W. Tijssen

Integration of environmental impacts into ex-post assessments of international agricultural research: Conceptual issues, applications, and the way forward pp. 216-228

Jeffrey Bennett, Timothy G. Kelley and Mywish Maredia

Quality and influence in literary work: evaluating the 'educated imagination' pp. 229-241

Alesia Zuccala

2012, volume 21, articles 2

The role of references in scientific papers: Cited papers as objects of research pp. 87-88

Marek Kosmulski

Assessing research network and disciplinary engagement changes induced by an NSF program pp. 89-104

Jon G. Garner, Alan L. Porter, Nils C. Newman and Todd A. Crowl

Public gains from entrepreneurial research: Inferences about the economic value of public support of the Small Business Innovation Research program pp. 105-112

Stuart Allen, Stephen K. Layson and Albert Link

Sub-field normalization in the multiplicative case: High- and low-impact citation indicators pp. 113-125

Neus Herranz and Javier Ruiz-Castillo

Cyclical long-term development of complex technologies--Premature expectations in nanotechnology?-super-† pp. 126-135

Ulrich Schmoch and Axel Thielmann

Learning to invest better: Using ex post investment analysis on agri-environmental research and development pp. 136-151

Stuart Pearson, Peter Chudleigh, Sarah Simpson and Nick Schofield

The importance of integrating risk in retrospective evaluations of research and development-super-† pp. 152-165

Peter Linquiti

2012, volume 21, articles 1

Research Evaluation, Bill Page and Oxford University Press pp. 1-1

Gretchen B. Jordan

Evaluating the performance of academic departments: an analysis of research-related output efficiency pp. 2-14

Tommaso Agasisti, Giuseppe Catalano, Paolo Landoni and Roberto Verganti

Research centers as agents of change in the contemporary academic landscape: their role and impact in HBCU, EPSCoR, and Majority universities pp. 15-32

Juan D. Rogers

Evaluating the demand side: New challenges for evaluation pp. 33-47

J. Edler, L. Georghiou, K. Blind and Elvira Uyarra

Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices pp. 48-60

Terttu Luukkonen

Redefining the field of economics: Improving field normalization for the application of bibliometric techniques in the field of economics pp. 61-70

Thed N. van Leeuwen and Clara Calero Medina

Opening the black box of QS World University Rankings pp. 71-78

Mu-Hsuan Huang

Calibration of bibliometric indicators in space exploration research: a comparison of citation impact measurement of the space and ground-based life and physical sciences pp. 79-85

A.J. Nederhof, T.N. Van Leeuwen and P. Clancy

2011, volume 20, articles 5

Farewell Beech Tree, hello Oxford University Press pp. 351-351

William Page

What are the key indicators for evaluating the activities of universities? pp. 353-363

Davinia Palomares-Montero and Adela García-Aracil

Systematic grant and funding body acknowledgement data for publications: new dimensions and new controversies for research policy and evaluation pp. 365-375

John Rigby

Perceptions and actions: relationships of views on risk with citation actions of nanotechnology scientists pp. 377-388

Jan Youtie, Stephen Carley, Philip Shapira, Elizabeth A Corley and Dietram A Scheufele

Measuring the influence of nanotechnology environmental, health and safety research pp. 389-395

Stephen Carley and Alan L Porter

Categorizing h-index variants pp. 397-409

M Schreiber, Chrysovalantis Malesios and S Psarakis

Mobility, productivity, gender and career development of Argentinean life scientists pp. 411-421

Koen Jonkers

2011, volume 20, articles 4

Introduction to a special section on approaches to predicting and tracing R&D program effects for policy learning pp. 263-266

Juan D Rogers and Gretchen Jordan

The interactive heuristic review mechanism: a new method of assessing pioneering research projects of the National Natural Science Foundation of China pp. 267-274

Yue Wang, Xiaoxuan Li and Yonghe Zheng

Using fishbone analysis to improve the quality of proposals for science and technology programs pp. 275-282

Shan-Shan Li and Ling-Chu Lee

Promoting interdisciplinarity in the life sciences: a case study pp. 283-292

Kate Baumwol, Sharon T Mortimer, Timothy R Huerta, Cameron D Norman and Alison M J Buchan

Evaluating Ohio's portfolio of technology programs pp. 293-303

David Cheney and Jennifer Ozawa

Tracing from applied research programs to downstream innovations: value in multiple techniques pp. 305-312

Rosalie Ruegg and Patrick Thomas

TEKES impact goals, logic model and evaluation of socio-economic effects pp. 313-323

Jari Hyvärinen

Average-based versus high- and low-impact indicators for the evaluation of scientific distributions pp. 325-339

Pedro Albarran, Ignacio Ortuño and Javier Ruiz-Castillo

A disadvantage of h-type indices for comparing the citation impact of two researchers pp. 341-346

L Egghe

2011, volume 20, articles 3

State of the art in assessing research impact: introduction to a special issue pp. 175-179

Claire Donovan

The ‘Payback Framework’ explained pp. 181-183

Claire Donovan and Stephen Hanney

An evaluation of the Mind-Body Interactions and Health Program: assessing the impact of an NIH program using the Payback Framework pp. 185-192

Jack E Scott, Margaret Blasinsky, Mary Dufour, Rachel J Mandai and G Stephane Philogene

Evaluating health research funding in Ireland: assessing the impacts of the Health Research Board of Ireland's funding activities pp. 193-200

Edward Nason, Brendan Curran, Stephen Hanney, Barbara Janta, Gillian Hastings, Mairéad O'Driscoll and Steven Wooding

Assessing policy and practice impacts of social science research: the application of the Payback Framework to assess the Future of Work programme pp. 201-209

Lisa Klautzer, Stephen Hanney, Edward Nason, Jennifer Rubin, Jonathan Grant and Steven Wooding

Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment pp. 211-218

Jack Spaapen and Leonie van Drooge

Tracing ‘productive interactions’ to identify social impacts: an example from the social sciences pp. 219-226

Jordi Molas-Gallart and Puay Tang

Real-world approaches to assessing the impact of environmental research on policy pp. 227-237

Sarah Bell, Ben Shaw and Annette Boaz

Peer review and the ex ante assessment of societal impacts pp. 239-246

J Britt Holbrook and Robert Frodeman

The Research Excellence Framework and the ‘impact agenda’: are we creating a Frankenstein monster? pp. 247-254

Ben Martin

The impact of impact pp. 255-256

John D Brewer

The impact of Payback research: developing and using evidence in policy pp. 257-258

Chris Henshall

The payback of ‘Payback’: challenges in assessing research impact pp. 259-260

Martin Buxton

2011, volume 20, articles 2

Research: metrics, quality, and management implications pp. 90-106

Peter Andras

Normalization of peer-evaluation measures of group research quality across academic disciplines pp. 107-116

Ralph Kenna and Bertrand Berche

A bibliometric study of productivity and impact of modern language and literature research pp. 117-129

Anton J Nederhof

Measuring research performance during a changing relationship between science and society pp. 131-143

Erik Ernø-Kjølhede and Finn Hansson

Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science pp. 145-158

William Trochim

Evaluation of ST&I programs: a methodological approach to the Brazilian Small Business Program and some comparisons with the SBIR program pp. 159-171

Sergio Salles-Filho, Maria Beatriz Bonacelli, Ana Maria Carneiro, Paula F Drummond de Castro and Fernando Oliveira Santos

2011, volume 20, articles 1

Designing indicators for policy decisions: challenges, tensions and good practices: introduction to a special issue pp. 3-5

Benedetto Lepori, Emanuela Reale and Robert Tijssen

Indicator needs for the internationalisation of science policies pp. 7-17

Jakob Edler and Kieron Flanagan

Evaluation of firm R&D and innovation support: new indicators and the ex-ante prediction of ex-post additionality pp. 19-29

Bianca Potì and Giovanni Cerulli

Informed peer review and uninformed bibliometrics? pp. 31-46

Jörg Neufeld and Markus von Ins

New uses of the institutional databases of universities: indicators of research activity pp. 47-60

Emanuela Reale, Daniela Alejandra De Filippo, Isabel Gómez, Benedetto Lepori, Bianca Potì, Emilia Primeri, Carole Probst and Elias Sanz Casado

Evaluation of research in context: an approach and two cases pp. 61-72

Stefan P L de Jong, Pleun van Arensbergen, Floortje Daemen, Barend van der Meulen and Peter van den Besselaar

Profiles and beyond: constructing consensus on measuring research output in communication sciences pp. 73-88

Carole Probst, Benedetto Lepori, Daniela De Filippo and Diana Ingenhoff