Learning versus Stealing: How Important Are Market-Share Reallocations to India's Productivity Growth?
Ann Harrison (),
Leslie Martin () and
World Bank Economic Review, 2013, vol. 27, issue 2, 202-228
Recent trade theory emphasizes the role of market-share reallocations across firms (“stealing”) in driving productivity growth, whereas previous literature focused on average productivity improvements (“learning”). We use comprehensive, firm-level data from India's organized manufacturing sector to show that market-share reallocations were briefly relevant to explain aggregate productivity gains following the beginning of India's trade reforms in 1991. However, aggregate productivity gains during the period from 1985 to 2004 were largely driven by improvements in average productivity. We show that India's trade, FDI, and licensing reforms are not associated with productivity gains stemming from market share reallocations. Instead, we find that most of the productivity improvements in Indian manufacturing occurred through “learning” and that this learning was linked to the reforms. In the Indian case, the evidence rejects the notion that market share reallocations are the mechanism through which trade reform increases aggregate productivity. Although a plausible response would be that India's labor laws do not easily permit market share reallocations, we show that restrictions on labor mobility cannot explain our results. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Learning Versus Stealing: How Important are Market-Share Reallocations to India's Productivity Growth? (2011)
Working Paper: Learning versus Stealing How Important are Market-Share Reallocations to India's Productivity Growth (2011)
Working Paper: Learning versus stealing: how Important are market-share -- reallocations to India's productivity growth? (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:27:y:2013:i:2:p:202-228
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
World Bank Economic Review is currently edited by Jaime de Melo
More articles in World Bank Economic Review from World Bank Group Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press () and Christopher F. Baum ().