Understanding the Gender Pay Gap: What's Competition Got to Do with it?

Alan Manning and Farzad Saidi

ILR Review, 2010, vol. 63, issue 4, 681-698

Abstract: A number of researchers have argued that men and women have different attitudes toward and behavioral responses to competition; that is, women are more likely to opt out of jobs in which performance pay is the norm and to under-perform in some competitive situations. Laboratory experiments suggest that these gender differences are rather large. To check these hypotheses and findings against differences in the field, the authors use performance pay as an indicator of competition in the workplace and compare the gender gap not only in incidence of performance pay but also in earnings and work effort under these contracts. They find that although women are less likely than men to work under performance pay contracts, the gender gap is small. Furthermore, the effect of performance pay on earnings is modest and does not differ markedly by gender. Consequently, the authors argue, the ability of these competition hypotheses to explain the gender pay gap seems very limited.

Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (63)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001979391006300407 (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Understanding the Gender Pay Gap: What's Competition Got to Do with It? (2008)
Working Paper: Understanding the gender pay gap: what's competition got to do with it? (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:63:y:2010:i:4:p:681-698

DOI: 10.1177/001979391006300407

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in ILR Review from Cornell University, ILR School
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().