The Role of Skill Versus Luck in Poker Evidence From the World Series of Poker

Steven Levitt and Thomas J. Miles

Journal of Sports Economics, 2014, vol. 15, issue 1, 31-44

Abstract: In determining the legality of online poker—a multibillion dollar industry—courts have relied heavily on the issue of whether or not poker is a game of skill. Using newly available data, the authors analyze that question by examining the performance in the 2010 World Series of Poker of a group of poker players identified as being highly skilled prior to the start of the events. Those players identified a priori as being highly skilled achieved an average return on investment of over 30%, compared to a −15% for all other players. This large gap in returns is strong evidence in support of the idea that poker is a game of skill.

Keywords: gambling; poker (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1527002512449471 (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: The Role of Skill Versus Luck in Poker: Evidence from the World Series of Poker (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:jospec:v:15:y:2014:i:1:p:31-44

DOI: 10.1177/1527002512449471

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Sports Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().