Economics at your fingertips  

Storable votes and judicial nominations in the US Senate

Alessandra Casella (), Sébastien Turban and Gregory Wawro
Additional contact information
Sébastien Turban: Department of Economics, Columbia University, USA
Gregory Wawro: Department of Political Science, Columbia University, USA

Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2017, vol. 29, issue 2, 243-272

Abstract: We model a procedural reform aimed at restoring a proper role for the minority in the confirmation process of judicial nominations in the US Senate. We propose that nominations to the same level court be collected in periodic lists and voted upon individually with storable votes, allowing each senator to allocate freely across the list a fixed number of total votes. Although each nomination is decided by simple majority, storable votes make it possible for the minority to win occasionally, but only when the relative importance its members assign to a nomination is higher than the relative importance assigned by the majority. Numerical simulations approximate the composition of the 113th and 114th Senates. Under plausible assumptions motivated by a game theoretic model, we find that a minority of 45 senators would be able to win about 20 percent of confirmation battles when the majority party controls the presidency, and between 40 and 60 percent when the president identifies with the minority party. For most parameter values, the possibility of minority victories increases aggregate welfare.

Keywords: U.S. Senate; filibuster; storable votes; minority representation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Storable Votes and Judicial Nominations in the U.S. Senate (2014) Downloads
Working Paper: Storable Votes and Judicial Nominations in the U.S. Senate (2014) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Theoretical Politics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

Page updated 2020-09-03
Handle: RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:29:y:2017:i:2:p:243-272