EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Challenges and Contradictions in the ‘Normalising’ of Precarious Work

Jill Rubery, Damian Grimshaw, Arjan Keizer and Mathew Johnson
Additional contact information
Jill Rubery: The University of Manchester, UK
Arjan Keizer: The University of Manchester, UK
Mathew Johnson: The University of Manchester, UK

Work, Employment & Society, 2018, vol. 32, issue 3, 509-527

Abstract: Precarious work is increasingly considered the new ‘norm’ to which employment and social protection systems must adjust. This article explores the contradictions and tensions that arise from different processes of normalisation driven by social policies that simultaneously decommodify and recommodify labour. An expanded framework of decommodification is presented that identifies how the standard employment relationship (SER) may be extended and flexibilised to include those in precarious work, drawing examples from a recent study of precarious work across six European countries. These decommodification processes are found to be both partial and, in some cases, coexisting with activation policies that position precarious work as an alternative to unemployment, thereby recommodifying labour. Despite these challenges and contradictions, the article argues that a new vision of SER reform promises greater inclusion than alternative policy scenarios that give up on the regulation of employers and rely on state subsidies to mitigate against precariousness.

Keywords: activation; basic income; commodification; decommodification; employment relationship; employment rights; precarious work; social protection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017017751790 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:woemps:v:32:y:2018:i:3:p:509-527

DOI: 10.1177/0950017017751790

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Work, Employment & Society from British Sociological Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:32:y:2018:i:3:p:509-527