Public and decision maker stated preferences for pharmaceutical subsidy decisions

Jennifer Whitty (), Paul Scuffham and Sharyn Rundle-Thielee

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2011, vol. 9, issue 2, 73-79

Abstract: This study sets the foundation for future research on the relative importance of decision criteria, the contexts that impact on the criteria and the extent to which funding decisions for pharmaceuticals in Australia and elsewhere are consistent with the preferences of society. Copyright Adis Data Information BV 2011

Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2165/11537150-000000000-00000 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:9:y:2011:i:2:p:73-79

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40258

DOI: 10.2165/11537150-000000000-00000

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy is currently edited by Timothy Wrightson

More articles in Applied Health Economics and Health Policy from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().