 Competitive pricing despite search costs when lower price signals qualityEconomic Theory, 2021, vol. 71, issue 1, No 12, 317-339 Abstract: Abstract The Diamond paradox demonstrates that when learning prices is costly for consumers, each firm has market power. However, making firms privately informed about their quality and cost restores competitive pricing if quality and cost are negatively correlated. Such correlation arises from, e.g. regulation, differing equipment or skill, or economies of scale. If good quality firms have lower costs, then they can signal quality by cutting prices, in which case bad quality firms must cut prices to retain customers. This price-cutting race to the bottom ends in an equilibrium in which all firms price nearly competitively and cheap talk reveals quality. Keywords: Price signalling; Diamond paradox; Incomplete information; Price war (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joecth:v:71:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s00199-020-01247-3 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1007/s00199-020-01247-3 Access Statistics for this article Economic Theory is currently edited by Nichoals Yanneils More articles in Economic Theory from Springer, Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET) Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.