EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness

Gary Bolton (), Rami Zwick () and Elena Katok ()

International Journal of Game Theory, 1998, vol. 27, issue 2, 269-299

Abstract: In both dictator and impunity games, one player, the dictator, divides a fixed amount of money between himself and one other, the recipient. Recent lab studies of these games have produced seemingly inconsistent results, reporting substantially divergent amounts of dictator giving. Also, one prominent explanation for some of these differences, the impact of experimenter observation, displayed weak explanatory power in a different but related lab game. Data from the new experiment reported here offers some explanations. We find that dictators determine how much they will give on the basis of the total money available for the entire experimental session, not on the basis of what is available per game. This explains the reported differences between impunity and dictator studies. When distributing a gift among several recipients, individual dictators show little tendency towards equal treatment. Also, we find no evidence for the experimenter observation effect. Comparison with earlier experiments suggests that differences in the context of the game, affected by differences in written directions and independent of experimenter observation, account for differences across dictator studies. We propose a hypothetical decision procedure, based on the notion that dictator giving originates with personal and social rules that effectively constrain self-interested behavior. The procedure provides a link between dictator behavior and a broader class of laboratory phenomena.

Keywords: Fairness; ·; dictator; game; ·; altruism; ·; anonymity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998-08-31
Note: Received August 1993/Final version April 1994 received additional support from a Research Initiation Grant, Penn State University. We are grateful for the comments of Jon Baron and an anonymous referee. Special thanks to Keith Ord for his advice on statistical analysis and to Shelly Geers for her assistance in running the experiments.-->
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (177) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00182/papers/8027002/80270269.pdf (application/pdf)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jogath:v:27:y:1998:i:2:p:269-299

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... eory/journal/182/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Game Theory is currently edited by Shmuel Zamir, Vijay Krishna and Bernhard von Stengel

More articles in International Journal of Game Theory from Springer, Game Theory Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().

 
Page updated 2020-03-29
Handle: RePEc:spr:jogath:v:27:y:1998:i:2:p:269-299