Comparing generalized median voter schemes according to their manipulability

R. Pablo Arribillaga and Jordi Masso

Theoretical Economics, 2016, vol. 11, issue 2

Abstract: We propose a simple criterion to compare generalized median voter schemes according to their manipulability. We identify three necessary and sufficient conditions for the comparability of two generalized median voter schemes in terms of their vulnerability to manipulation. The three conditions are stated using the two associated families of monotonic fixed ballots and depend very much on the power each agent has to unilaterally change the outcomes of the two generalized median voter schemes. We perform a specific analysis of all median voter schemes, the anonymous subfamily of generalized median voter schemes.

Keywords: Generalized median voting schemes; strategy-proofness; anonymity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C78 D78 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-05-18
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)

Downloads: (external link)
http://econtheory.org/ojs/index.php/te/article/viewFile/20160547/15460/455 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Comparing Generalized Median Voter Schemes According to their Manipulability (2015)
Working Paper: Comparing Generalized Median Voter Schemes According to their Manipulability (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:the:publsh:1910

Access Statistics for this article

Theoretical Economics is currently edited by Simon Board, Todd D. Sarver, Juuso Toikka, Rakesh Vohra, Pierre-Olivier Weill

More articles in Theoretical Economics from Econometric Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Martin J. Osborne ().