Has NCLB Encouraged Educational Triage? Accountability and the Distribution of Achievement Gains
Dale Ballou () and
Matthew Springer
Additional contact information
Dale Ballou: Peabody College Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37203
Education Finance and Policy, 2017, vol. 12, issue 1, 77-106
Abstract:
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) has been criticized for encouraging schools to neglect students whose performance exceeds the proficiency threshold or lies so far below it that there is no reasonable prospect of closing the gap during the current year. We examine this hypothesis using longitudinal data from 2002–03 through 2005–06. Our identification strategy relies on the fact that as NCLB was phased in, states had some latitude in designating which grades were to count for purposes of a school making adequate yearly progress. We compare the mathematics achievement distribution in a grade before and after it became a high-stakes grade. We find in general no evidence that gains were concentrated on students near the proficiency standard at the expense of students scoring much lower, though there are inconsistent signs of a trade-off with students at the upper end of the distribution.
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/EDFP_a_00189 (application/pdf)
Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:12:y:2017:i:1:p:77-106
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://mitpressjour ... rnal/?issn=1557-3060
Access Statistics for this article
Education Finance and Policy is currently edited by Stephanie Riegg Cellini and Randall Reback
More articles in Education Finance and Policy from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The MIT Press ().