EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Effect of Manager Gender and Performance Feedback: Experimental Evidence from India

Martin Abel and Daniel Buchman

Economic Development and Cultural Change, 2024, vol. 73, issue 1, 307 - 338

Abstract: We hire 2,228 Indian gig-economy workers for a real-effort transcription task and randomize the gender of the (fictitious) manager as well as the delivery of performance feedback. We find that negative feedback (i.e., criticism) leads to moderate deterioration in worker attitudes, but it increases effort provision in both mandatory and voluntary tasks. By contrast, praise affects neither attitudes nor effort provision. Importantly, feedback effects do not vary between workers assigned to female and male managers. Consistent with this finding, there is no evidence for attention discrimination toward female managers, implicit gender bias, or gendered expectations among workers. By contrast, Abel (J. Human Resources 59, no. 2:470–501, 2024) employs the same research design in the United States and finds substantial gender discrimination and no effect of feedback on effort. This highlights that the effects of feedback and manager gender vary across different contexts.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/727513 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/727513 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
Working Paper: The Effect of Manager Gender and Performance Feedback: Experimental Evidence from India (2020) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/727513

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic Development and Cultural Change from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-23
Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/727513