Subjective and Objective Indicators of Racial Progress

Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers

The Journal of Legal Studies, 2012, vol. 41, issue 2, 459 - 493

Abstract: Progress in closing differences in many objective outcomes for blacks relative to whites has slowed, and even worsened, over the past 3 decades. However, over this period the racial gap in happiness has shrunk. In the early 1970s data revealed much lower levels of subjective well-being among blacks relative to whites. Investigating various measures of well-being, we find that the well-being of blacks has increased both absolutely and relative to that of whites. While a racial gap in well-being remains, two-fifths of the gap has closed, and these gains have occurred despite little progress in closing other racial gaps such as those in income, employment, and education. Much of the current racial gap in happiness can be explained by differences in the objective conditions of the lives of black and white Americans. Thus, making further progress will likely require progress in closing racial gaps in objective circumstances.

Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/669963 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/669963 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
Working Paper: Subjective and Objective Indicators of Racial Progress (2013)
Working Paper: Subjective and Objective Indicators of Racial Progress (2013)
Working Paper: Subjective and Objective Indicators of Racial Progress (2013)
Working Paper: Subjective and Objective Indicators of Racial Progress (2013)
Working Paper: Subjective and Objective Indicators of Racial Progress (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/669963

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().