Rational Capital Budgeting in an Irrational World

Jeremy Stein

The Journal of Business, 1996, vol. 69, issue 4, 429-55

Abstract: This article addresses the following basic capital budgeting problem: suppose that cross-sectional differences in stock returns can be predicted based on variables other than beta (e.g., book-to-market) and that this predictability reflects market irrationality rather than compensation for fundamental risk. In this setting, how should companies determine hurdle rates? The author shows how factors such as managerial time horizons and financial constraints affect the optimal hurdle rate. Under some circumstances, beta can be useful as a capital budgeting tool, even if it is of no use in predicting stock returns. Copyright 1996 by University of Chicago Press.

Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (235)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209699 full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
Working Paper: Rational Capital Budgeting in an Irrational World (1996)
Working Paper: Rational Capital Budgeting in an Irrational World (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jnlbus:v:69:y:1996:i:4:p:429-55

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Business from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().