Rational Capital Budgeting in an Irrational World

Jeremy Stein

No 5496, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: This paper addresses the following basic capital budgeting question: Suppose that cross-sectional differences in stock returns can be predicted based on variables other than beta (e.g., book-to- market), and that this predictability reflects market irrationality rather than compensation for fundamental risk. In this setting, how should companies determine hurdle rates? I show how factors such as managerial time horizons and financial constraints affect the optimal hurdle rate. Under some circumstances, beta can be useful as a capital budgeting tool, even if it is of no use in predicting stock returns.

Date: 1996-03
Note: AP CF
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (232)

Published as Journal of Business, vol.69, no.4, October 1996, pp. 429-455.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w5496.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Rational Capital Budgeting in an Irrational World (1996)
Working Paper: Rational Capital Budgeting in an Irrational World (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:5496

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w5496

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().