Trouble in the Tails? What We Know about Earnings Nonresponse 30 Years after Lillard, Smith, and Welch

Christopher Bollinger, Barry T. Hirsch, Charles M. Hokayem and James Ziliak

Journal of Political Economy, 2019, vol. 127, issue 5, 2143 - 2185

Abstract: Earnings nonresponse in household surveys is widespread, yet there is limited knowledge of how nonresponse biases earnings measures. We examine the consequences of nonresponse on earnings gaps and inequality using Current Population Survey individual records linked to administrative earnings data. The common assumption that earnings are missing at random is rejected. Nonresponse across the earnings distribution is U-shaped, highest in the left and right tails. Inequality measures differ between household and administrative data due in part to nonresponse. Nonresponse biases earnings differentials by race, gender, and education, particularly in the tails. Flexible copula-based models can account for nonrandom nonresponse.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (77)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/701807 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/701807 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jpolec:doi:10.1086/701807

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Political Economy from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().