Asset Holding and Consumption Volatility

Orazio Attanasio, James Banks and Sarah Tanner

Journal of Political Economy, 2002, vol. 110, issue 4, 771-792

Abstract: We investigate the possibility that limited participation in asset markets, and the stock market in particular, might explain the lack of correspondence between the sample moments of the intertemporal marginal rate of substitution and asset returns in U.K. data. We estimate ownership probabilities to separate "likely" shareholders from nonshareholders, enabling us to control for changing composition effects as well as selection into the group. We then construct estimates of the IMRS for each of these different groups and consider their time-series properties. We find that the consumption growth of shareholders is more volatile than that of nonshareholders and more highly correlated with excess returns to shares. In particular, one cannot reject the predictions of the consumption capital asset pricing model for the group of households predicted to own both assets. This is in contrast to the failure of the model when estimated on data for all households.

Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (164)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/340774 main text (application/pdf)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
Working Paper: Asset holding and consumption volatility (1998)
Working Paper: Asset Holding and Consumption Volatility (1998)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:110:y:2002:i:4:p:771-792

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Political Economy from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().