Explaining the Favorite-Long Shot Bias: Is it Risk-Love or Misperceptions?

Erik Snowberg and Justin Wolfers

Journal of Political Economy, 2010, vol. 118, issue 4, 723-746

Abstract: The favorite-long shot bias describes the long-standing empirical regularity that betting odds provide biased estimates of the probability of a horse winning: long shots are overbet whereas favorites are underbet. Neoclassical explanations of this phenomenon focus on rational gamblers who overbet long shots because of risk-love. The competing behavioral explanations emphasize the role of misperceptions of probabilities. We provide novel empirical tests that can discriminate between these competing theories by assessing whether the models that explain gamblers' choices in one part of their choice set (betting to win) can also rationalize decisions over a wider choice set, including compound bets in the exacta, quinella, or trifecta pools. Using a new, large-scale data set ideally suited to implement these tests, we find evidence in favor of the view that misperceptions of probability drive the favorite-long shot bias, as suggested by prospect theory. (c) 2010 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.

Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (147)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/655844 link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Explaining the Favorite-Longshot Bias: Is it Risk-Love or Misperceptions? (2010)
Working Paper: Explaining the Favorite-Longshot Bias: Is it Risk-Love or Misperceptions? (2010)
Working Paper: Explaining the Favorite-Longshot Bias: Is it Risk-Love or Misperceptions? (2010)
Working Paper: Explaining the Favorite-Longshot Bias: Is it Risk-Love or Misperceptions? (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:118:y:2010:i:4:p:723-746

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Political Economy from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().