Unions, Wages, and Skills

Barry Hirsch () and Edward J. Schumacher

Journal of Human Resources, 1998, vol. 33, issue 1, 201-219

Abstract: Studies uniformly conclude that union wage effects are largest for workers with low measured skills. Longitudinal analysis using 1989/90-1994/95 Current Population Survey matched panels produces union premium estimates equivalent across skill groups, following appropriate sample restrictions and control for worker-specific skills. Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth on aptitude scores confirms that union workers with high measured skills have relatively low unmeasured skills. Differential selection by skill class and skill homogeneity in union workplaces results from employer and employee sorting in response to wage standardization, union organizing where skills are homogeneous, and unionized employers' reluctance to hire the most as well as least able workers.

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (31)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/146319
A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

Related works:
Working Paper: Unions, Wages, and Skills
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:33:y:1998:i:1:p:201-219

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Human Resources from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().