How to Improve Teaching Practice?: An Experimental Comparison of Centralized Training and In-Classroom Coaching

Jacobus Cilliers, Brahm Fleisch, Cas Prinsloo and Stephen Taylor

Journal of Human Resources, 2020, vol. 55, issue 3, 926-962

Abstract: We experimentally compare two modes of in-service professional development for South African public primary school teachers. In both modes teachers received the same learning materials and daily lesson plans, aligned to the official literacy curriculum. Students exposed to two years of the program improved their reading proficiency by 0.12 standard deviations if their teachers received centralized training, compared to 0.24 if their teachers received in-class coaching. Classroom observations reveal that teachers were more likely to split students into smaller reading groups, which enabled individualized attention and more opportunities to practice reading. Results vary by class size and baseline student reading proficiency.

JEL-codes: I20 I25 I28 O15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
Note: DOI: 10.3368/jhr.55.3.0618-9538R1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Downloads: (external link)
http://jhr.uwpress.org/cgi/reprint/55/3/926
A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

Related works:
Working Paper: How to improve teaching practice? Experimental comparison of centralized training and in-classroom coaching (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:55:y:2020:i:3:p:926-962

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Human Resources from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().