Hypothetical Surveys and Real Economic Commitments
Helen R. Neill,
Ronald G. Cummings,
Glenn Harrison () and
Land Economics, 1994, vol. 70, issue 2, 145-154
We provide controlled laboratory evidence that open-ended hypothetical surveys do not always accurately elicit real economic commitments from individuals. We argue that they can provide biased measures of true values, where the latter are elicited using incentive-compatible institutions. We also evaluate if it is the hypothetical-payment aspect of these surveys which results in these biases or the lack of explicitly incentive-compatible provision rules. We conclude that it is the former. We are unable to devise a hypothetical survey that uses an incentive-compatible provision rule to elicit valuations that are demonstrably truthful.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (128) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:landec:v:70:y:1994:i:2:p:145-154
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Land Economics from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().