Economics at your fingertips  

Neither Boon nor Bane: The Economic Effects of a Landscape-Scale National Monument

Paul Jakus () and Sherzod Akhundjanov ()

Land Economics, 2018, vol. 94, issue 3, 323-339

Abstract: The designation of landscape-scale national monuments has generated intense debate as to whether their regional economic effects are positive or negative. National monuments can restrict land uses, thus favoring economic development based on the low-wage tourism industry relative to higher-wage extractive industries. Utah’s Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument has been managed for landscape-scale conservation while protecting existing valid uses. We assess postdesignation trends in the ranching, mining, and tourism industries, after which pre- and postdesignation paths of per capita income are examined using difference-in-differences and synthetic control methods. We conclude that monument designation had no effect on regional per capita income.

JEL-codes: Q58 R11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
Note: DOI: 10.3368/le.94.3.323
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Land Economics from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

Page updated 2021-06-07
Handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:94:y:2018:i:3:p:323-339