Neither Boon nor Bane: The Economic Effects of a Landscape-Scale National Monument
Paul Jakus () and
Sherzod Akhundjanov ()
Land Economics, 2018, vol. 94, issue 3, 323-339
The designation of landscape-scale national monuments has generated intense debate as to whether their regional economic effects are positive or negative. National monuments can restrict land uses, thus favoring economic development based on the low-wage tourism industry relative to higher-wage extractive industries. Utah’s Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument has been managed for landscape-scale conservation while protecting existing valid uses. We assess postdesignation trends in the ranching, mining, and tourism industries, after which pre- and postdesignation paths of per capita income are examined using difference-in-differences and synthetic control methods. We conclude that monument designation had no effect on regional per capita income.
JEL-codes: Q58 R11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.3368/le.94.3.323
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwp:landec:v:94:y:2018:i:3:p:323-339
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Land Economics from University of Wisconsin Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().