EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Publicity of Debate and the Incentive to Dissent: Evidence from the US Federal Reserve

Ellen Meade and David Stasavage

Economic Journal, 2008, vol. 118, issue 528, 695-717

Abstract: Transparency in committee decision making may have clear benefits by making members more accountable to outside observers. We consider one potential cost: the possibility that publishing records of deliberations will make members more reluctant to offer dissenting opinions. We construct a model that compares incentives for members with ‘career concerns’ to voice dissent when deliberations occur in public or in private. We test the model using an original dataset based on deliberations of the Federal Reserve's Federal Open Market Committee, asking whether the FOMC's 1993 decision to begin releasing transcripts of its meetings has altered incentives for dissent. We find evidence that this is indeed the case.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (142)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02138.x

Related works:
Journal Article: Publicity of Debate and the Incentive to Dissent: Evidence from the US Federal Reserve (2008)
Working Paper: Publicity of Debate and the Incentive to Dissent: Evidence from the US Federal Reserve (2004) Downloads
Working Paper: Publicity of debate and the incentive to dissent: evidence from the US federal reserve (2004) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:econjl:v:118:y:2008:i:528:p:695-717

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://onlinelibrary ... 1111/(ISSN)1468-0297

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Estelle Cantillon, Martin Cripps, Andrea Galeotti, Morten Ravn, Kjell G. Salvanes, Frederic Vermeulen, Hans-Joachim Voth and Rachel Kranton

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:wly:econjl:v:118:y:2008:i:528:p:695-717