 A Quantitative Comparison of Sticky‐Price and Sticky‐Information Models of Price SettingJournal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2007, vol. 39, issue s1, 101-125 Abstract: I estimate sticky‐price and sticky‐information models of price setting for the United States via maximum‐likelihood techniques, reaching several conclusions. First, the sticky‐price model fits best, and captures inflation dynamics as well as reduced‐form equations once hybrid‐behavior is allowed. Second, the importance of hybrid behavior in sticky‐price models is potentially consistent with a role for some information imperfections, such as sticky information, as a complement to nominal price rigidities. Finally, the favorable results herein for the hybrid sticky‐price model when evaluated by statistics that summarize the relative fit of different models is consistent with the existing literature that is both supportive and dismissive of such models, as this literature has largely ignored fit in evaluating such models. Many previous studies have focused on ancillary issues, such as the standard errors associated with certain parameters or Granger‐causality tests that may not provide much information about sticky‐price models. Date: 2007 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jmoncb:v:39:y:2007:i:s1:p:101-125 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Money, Credit and Banking is currently edited by Robert deYoung, Paul Evans, Pok-Sang Lam and Kenneth D. West More articles in Journal of Money, Credit and Banking from Blackwell Publishing |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.