Banking on the Boom, Tripped by the Bust: Banks and the World War I Agricultural Price Shock

Matthew Jaremski and David Wheelock

Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2020, vol. 52, issue 7, 1719-1754

Abstract: How do banks respond to asset booms? This paper examines (i) how U.S. banks responded to the World War I farmland boom; (ii) the impact of regulation; and (iii) how bank closures exacerbated the postwar bust. The boom encouraged new bank formation and balance sheet expansion (especially by new banks). Deposit insurance amplified the impact of rising crop prices on bank portfolios, while higher minimum capital requirements dampened the effects. Banks that responded most aggressively to the asset boom had a higher probability of closing in the bust, and counties with more bank closures experienced larger declines in land prices.

Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12725

Related works:
Working Paper: Banking on the Boom, Tripped by the Bust: Banks and the World War I Agricultural Price Shock (2018)
Working Paper: Banking on the Boom, Tripped by the Bust: Banks and the World War I Agricultural Price Shock (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:jmoncb:v:52:y:2020:i:7:p:1719-1754

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Money, Credit and Banking is currently edited by Robert deYoung, Paul Evans, Pok-Sang Lam and Kenneth D. West

More articles in Journal of Money, Credit and Banking from Blackwell Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().