Inflation and professional forecast dynamics: An evaluation of stickiness, persistence, and volatility

Elmar Mertens and James Nason

Quantitative Economics, 2020, vol. 11, issue 4, 1485-1520

Abstract: This paper studies the joint dynamics of U.S. inflation and a term structure of average inflation predictions taken from the Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF). We estimate these joint dynamics by combining an unobserved components (UC) model of inflation and a sticky‐information forecast mechanism. The UC model decomposes inflation into trend and gap components, and innovations to trend and gap inflation are affected by stochastic volatility. A novelty of our model is to allow for time‐variation in inflation‐gap persistence as well as in the frequency of forecast updating under sticky information. The model is estimated with sequential Monte Carlo methods that include a particle learning filter and a Rao–Blackwellized particle smoother. Based on data from 1968Q4 to 2018Q3, estimates show that (i) longer horizon average SPF inflation predictions inform estimates of trend inflation; (ii) inflation gap persistence is countercyclical before the Volcker disinflation and acyclical afterwards; (iii) by 1990 sticky‐information inflation forecast updating is less frequent than it was earlier in the sample; and (iv) the drop in the frequency of the sticky‐information forecast updating occurs at the same time persistent shocks become less important for explaining movements in inflation. Our findings support the view that stickiness in survey forecasts is not invariant to the inflation process.

Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.3982/QE980

Related works:
Working Paper: Inflation and professional forecast dynamics: an evaluation of stickiness, persistence, and volatility (2018)
Working Paper: Inflation and professional forecast dynamics: An evaluation of stickiness, persistence, and volatility (2017)
Working Paper: Inflation and Professional Forecast Dynamics: An Evaluation of Stickiness, Persistence, and Volatility (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:quante:v:11:y:2020:i:4:p:1485-1520

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.econometricsociety.org/membership

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Quantitative Economics from Econometric Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().