Gender differences and dynamics in competition: The role of luck

David Gill and Victoria Prowse

Quantitative Economics, 2014, vol. 5, 351-376

Abstract: In a real effort experiment with repeated competition we find striking differences in how the work effort of men and women responds to previous wins and losses. For women, losing per se is detrimental to productivity, but for men, a loss impacts negatively on productivity only when the prize at stake is big enough. Responses to luck are more persistent and explain more of the variation in behavior for women, and account for about half of the gender performance gap in our experiment. Our findings shed new light on why women may be less inclined to pursue competition‐intensive careers.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (84)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/quan.2014.5.issue-2.x

Related works:
Working Paper: Gender Differences and Dynamics in Competition: The Role of Luck (2013)
Working Paper: Gender differences and dynamics in competition: the role of luck (2012)
Working Paper: Gender Differences and Dynamics in Competition: The Role of Luck (2011)
Working Paper: Gender Differences and Dynamics in Competition: The Role of Luck (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:quante:v:5:y:2014:i::p:351-376

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.econometricsociety.org/membership

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Quantitative Economics from Econometric Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().