EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Testing consumer theory: evidence from a natural field experiment

Maja Adena (), Steffen Huck () and Imran Rasul ()

EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, 2017, 89-108

Abstract: We present evidence from a natural field experiment designed to shed light on whether individual behavior is consistent with a neoclassical model of utility maximization subject to budget constraints. We do this through the lens of a field experiment on charitable giving. We find that the behavior of at least 80% of individuals, on both the extensive and intensive margins, can be rationalized within a standard neoclassical choice model in which individuals have preferences, defined over own consumption and their contribution towards the charitable good, satisfying the axioms of revealed preference.

Keywords: natural field experiment; revealed preference (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C93 D01 D12 D64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/172507/1/f ... et_al-Testing-v3.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Testing consumer theory: evidence from a natural field experiment (2017) Downloads
Working Paper: Testing Consumer Theory: Evidence From a Natural Field Experiment (2017) Downloads
Working Paper: Testing consumer theory: Evidence from a natural field experiment (2017) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:espost:172507

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters from ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().

 
Page updated 2021-07-27
Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:172507