EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Limited Self-Knowledge and Survey Response Behavior

Armin Falk, Thomas Neuber (thomas.neuber@uni-bonn.de) and Philipp Strack (philipp.strack@yale.edu)
Additional contact information
Thomas Neuber: University of Bonn
Philipp Strack: Yale University

No 106, ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series from University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany

Abstract: We study response behavior in surveys and show how the explanatory power of selfreports can be improved. First, we develop a choice model of survey response behavior under the assumption that the respondent has imperfect self-knowledge about her individual characteristics. In panel data, the model predicts that the variance in responses for different characteristics increases in self-knowledge and that the variance for a given characteristic over time is non-monotonic in self-knowledge. Importantly, the ratio of these variances identifies an individual’s level of self-knowledge, i.e., the latter can be inferred from observed response patterns. Second, we develop a consistent and unbiased estimator for self-knowledge based on the model. Third, we run an experiment to test the model’s main predictions in a context where the researcher knows the true underlying characteristics. The data confirm the model’s predictions as well as the estimator’s validity. Finally, we turn to a large panel data set, estimate individual levels of self-knowledge, and show that accounting for differences in self-knowledge significantly increases the explanatory power of regression models. Using a median split in self-knowledge and regressing risky behaviors on self-reported risk attitudes, we find that the R2 can be multiple times larger for above- than below-median subjects. Similarly, gender differences in risk attitudes are considerably larger when restricting samples to subjects with high self-knowledge. These examples illustrate how using the estimator may improve inference from survey data.

Keywords: survey research; rational inattention; lab experiment; non-cognitive skills; preferences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C83 C91 D83 D91 J24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 59 pages
Date: 2021-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp, nep-isf and nep-knm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econtribute.de/RePEc/ajk/ajkdps/ECONtribute_106_2021.pdf First version, 2021 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Limited Self-Knowledge and Survey Response Behavior (2021) Downloads
Working Paper: Limited Self-Knowledge and Survey Response Behavior (2021) Downloads
Working Paper: Limited Self-knowledge and Survey Response Behavior (2021) Downloads
Working Paper: Limited Self-knowledge and Survey Response Behavior (2021) Downloads
Working Paper: Limited Self-knowledge and Survey Response Behavior (2021) Downloads
Working Paper: Limited Self-Knowledge and Survey Response Behavior (2021) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:106

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series from University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany Niebuhrstrasse 5, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ECONtribute Office (research@econtribute.de).

 
Page updated 2025-03-24
Handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:106