Discrete Choice and Rational Inattention: a General Equivalence Result

Mogens Fosgerau, Emerson Melo, André de Palma () and Matthew Shum ()

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: This paper establishes a general equivalence between discrete choice and rational inattention models. Matejka and McKay (2015, AER) showed that when information costs are modelled using the Shannon entropy function, the resulting choice probabilities in the rational inattention model take the multinomial logit form. By exploiting convex-analytic properties of the discrete choice model, we show that when information costs are modelled using a class of generalized entropy functions, the choice probabilities in any rational inattention model are observationally equivalent to some additive random utility discrete choice model and vice versa. Thus any additive random utility model can be given an interpretation in terms of boundedly rational behavior. This includes empirically relevant specifications such as the probit and nested logit models.

Date: 2017-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm, nep-tre and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.09117 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: DISCRETE CHOICE AND RATIONAL INATTENTION: A GENERAL EQUIVALENCE RESULT (2020)
Working Paper: Discrete Choice and Rational Inattention: A General Equivalence Result (2017)
Working Paper: Discrete Choice and Rational Inattention: a General Equivalence Result (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:1709.09117

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().