Estimating the COVID-19 Infection Rate: Anatomy of an Inference Problem

Charles Manski and Francesca Molinari

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: As a consequence of missing data on tests for infection and imperfect accuracy of tests, reported rates of population infection by the SARS CoV-2 virus are lower than actual rates of infection. Hence, reported rates of severe illness conditional on infection are higher than actual rates. Understanding the time path of the COVID-19 pandemic has been hampered by the absence of bounds on infection rates that are credible and informative. This paper explains the logical problem of bounding these rates and reports illustrative findings, using data from Illinois, New York, and Italy. We combine the data with assumptions on the infection rate in the untested population and on the accuracy of the tests that appear credible in the current context. We find that the infection rate might be substantially higher than reported. We also find that the infection fatality rate in Italy is substantially lower than reported.

Date: 2020-04
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (61)

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.06178 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Estimating the COVID-19 infection rate: Anatomy of an inference problem (2021)
Working Paper: Estimating the COVID-19 Infection Rate: Anatomy of an Inference Problem (2020)
Working Paper: Estimating the COVID-19 Infection Rate: Anatomy of an Inference Problem (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2004.06178

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().