What Do We Get from Two-Way Fixed Effects Regressions? Implications from Numerical Equivalence

Shoya Ishimaru

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: This paper develops numerical and causal interpretations of two-way fixed effects (TWFE) regressions in settings with nonbinary, nonstaggered treatments and time-varying covariates. Using the equivalence between TWFE and pooled first-difference (FD) regressions, I express the TWFE coefficient as a weighted average of FD coefficients across all horizons, clarifying how short- and long-run changes contribute to the estimate. Causal interpretation of the TWFE coefficient relies on common trends assumptions at all horizons simultaneously, whereas each FD coefficient relies on the assumption only at its own horizon. This structure opens the identifying assumptions to empirical scrutiny: I propose diagnostic procedures that assess common trends horizon by horizon, and illustrate them by reexamining TWFE estimates of minimum-wage effects on employment.

Date: 2021-03, Revised 2026-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.12374 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2103.12374

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().