Random Utility with Aggregation

Yuexin Liao, Kota Saito and Alec Sandroni

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: We characterize when discrete-choice datasets that involve aggregation, such as category-level items or an outside option, are consistent with a random utility model (RUM). The underlying alternatives that an aggregated category represents may differ across individuals and remain unobserved by the analyst. We characterize the observable implications of RUMs with unknown composition of aggregated categories and show that they are surprisingly weak, implying only limited monotonicity of choice frequencies and standard RUM consistency on unaggregated menus. These restrictions are insufficient to justify the aggregated random utility model (ARUM) commonly assumed in empirical work. We identify two sufficient conditions that restore the implication of ARUM: non-overlapping preferences and menu-independent aggregation. Simulations show that violations of these conditions generate estimation bias, highlighting the practical importance of how data are aggregated.

Date: 2025-05, Revised 2025-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm, nep-ecm, nep-mic and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.00372 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2506.00372

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().