Rational Cost Inefficiency in Chinese Banks
Kent Matthews (),
Zhiguo Xiao () and
No E2009/13, Cardiff Economics Working Papers from Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section
According to a frequently cited finding by Berger et al (1993), X-inefficiency contributes 20% to cost-inefficiency in western banks. Empirical studies of Chinese banks tend to place cost-inefficiency in the region of 50%. Such estimates would suggest that Chinese banks suffer from gross cost inefficiency. Using a non-parametric bootstrapping method, this study decomposes cost-inefficiency in Chinese banks into X-inefficiency and allocative-inefficiency. It argues that allocative inefficiency is the optimal outcome of input resource allocation subject to enforced employment constraints. The resulting analysis suggests that allowing for rational allocative inefficiency,Chinese banks are no better or worse than their western counterparts.
Keywords: Bank Efficiency; China; X-inefficiency; DEA; Bootstrapping (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D23 G21 G28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eff and nep-tra
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Rational Cost Inefficiency in Chinese Banks (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdf:wpaper:2009/13
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Cardiff Economics Working Papers from Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Yongdeng Xu ().