Rational Cost Inefficiency in Chinese Banks
Kent Matthews (),
Zhiguo Xiao () and
Additional contact information
Xu Zhang: Citigroup (China), Cardiff University
No 292009, Working Papers from Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research
According to a frequently cited finding by Berger et al (1993), X-inefficiency contributes 20% to cost-inefficiency in western banks. Empirical studies of Chinese banks tend to place cost-inefficiency in the region of 50%. Such estimates would suggest that Chinese banks suffer from gross cost inefficiency. Using a non-parametric bootstrapping method, this study decomposes cost-inefficiency in Chinese banks into X-inefficiency and allocative-inefficiency. It argues that allocative inefficiency is the optimal outcome of input resource allocation subject to enforced employment constraints. The resulting analysis suggests that allowing for rational allocative inefficiency; Chinese banks are no better or worse than their western counterparts.
Keywords: Bank Efficiency; China; X-inefficiency; DEA; Bootstrapping (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D23 G21 G28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ban, nep-eff and nep-tra
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Rational Cost Inefficiency in Chinese Banks (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hkm:wpaper:292009
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by HKIMR ().