Awards Unbundled: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
Nava Ashraf,
Oriana Bandiera and
Scott Lee
STICERD - Economic Organisation and Public Policy Discussion Papers Series from Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE
Abstract:
Organizations often use awards to incentivize performance. We design a field experiment to unbundle the mechanisms through which awards may affect behavior: by facilitating social comparison and by conferring recognition and visibility. In a nationwide health worker training program in Zambia, employer recognition and social visibility increase performance while social comparison reduces it, especially for low-ability trainees. These effects appear when treatments are announced and persist through training. The findings are consistent with a model of optimal expectations in which low-ability individuals exert low effort in order to avoid information about their relative ability.
Keywords: awards; social comparison; optimal expectations; incentives (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D83 D84 J33 M52 O15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-07
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
https://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/eopp/eopp46.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Awards unbundled: Evidence from a natural field experiment (2014) 
Working Paper: Awards unbundled: evidence from a natural field experiment (2014) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cep:stieop:046
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in STICERD - Economic Organisation and Public Policy Discussion Papers Series from Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().