Creditor Passivity: The Effects of Bank Competition and Institutions on the Strategic Use of Bankruptcy Filings

Christa Hainz

No 2179, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: Why do banks remain passive? In a model of bank-firm relationship we study the trade-off a bank faces when having defaulting firms declared bankrupt. First, the bank receives a payoff if a firm is liquidated. Second, it provides information about a firm’s type to its competitors. Thereby, asymmetric information between banks is reduced and bank competition intensifies. We find that the better the institutions and the more competitive the banking sector, the higher the bank’s incentive to bankrupt defaulting firms. This makes information between banks less asymmetric and thus leads to lower interest rates and less credit rationing.

Keywords: creditor passivity; bank competition; information sharing; institutions; bankruptcy; relationship banking (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D82 G21 G33 K10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp2179.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Creditor passivity: The effects of bank competition and institutions on the strategic use of bankruptcy filings (2009)
Working Paper: Creditor Passivity: The Effects of Bank Competition and Institutions on the Strategic Use of Bankruptcy Filings (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_2179

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().