Without liberty and justice, what extremes to expect? Two contemporary perspectives

Marcus Miller and Benjamin Zissimos

CAGE Online Working Paper Series from Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE)

Abstract: From a wide-ranging historical survey, Acemoglu and Robinson conclude that the preservation of liberty depends on being in a ‘narrow corridor’ where there is a balance of power between the state and society. We first examine the support Binmore's game-theoretic treatment of Social Contracts provides for such a ‘narrow corridor’ of liberty and justice – and what extremes to expect without them. We also consider how the biological model of Competing Species helps to describe the dynamics of conflicting powers outside the narrow corridor– where, as in contemporary Russia and China, any Social Contracts that exist are neither free nor fair.

Keywords: liberty; social contracts; repeated games; Competing Species; anarchy; Despotism; Neofeudalism JEL Classification: C70; C73; P00; Z13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cis, nep-gth, nep-his and nep-tra
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/c ... tions/wp591.2021.pdf

Related works:
Working Paper: Without liberty and justice, what extremes to expect? Two contemporary perspectives (2021)
Working Paper: Without liberty and justice, what extremes to expect? Two contemporary perspectives (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cge:wacage:591

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CAGE Online Working Paper Series from Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jane Snape ().