Multiparty Competition, Founding Elections and Political Business Cycles in Africa
Steven Block,
Smita Singh and
Karen E. Ferree
No 80A, CID Working Papers from Center for International Development at Harvard University
Abstract:
Political business cycle theory largely abstracts from institutional context, in particular assuming that elections are competitive. Yet, as empirical work on political business cycles turns increasingly to developing countries and nascent democracies for evidence, this assumption becomes untenable. We propose and test two empirical hypotheses: first, we should only see cycles when elections involve multiparty competition; second, we should see larger cycles in founding elections. Using an indicator of multiparty competition and applying recent advances in dynamic panel (generalized method of moments) econometrics to data from Africa, we find strong support for both hypotheses. These findings have implications for democratic transitions and the compatibility of economic and political reform in nascent democracies.
Keywords: elections; political business cycles; Africa; democratization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D72 N17 O11 O23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/ce ... rking-papers/080.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Multiparty Competition, Founding Elections and Political Business Cycles in Africa (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cid:wpfacu:80a
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CID Working Papers from Center for International Development at Harvard University 79 John F. Kennedy Street. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chuck McKenney ().